User blog:Void Samukai/Yamato vs Bismarck:Why?

You will probably see it pretty much in most naval forums. For some reason that I don't have a clue about, people believe that Yamato vs Bismarck would be a fair fight. Of course, this is assuming that Germany and Japan would be enemies or Hitler and Tojo were super drunk from sake and beer and decide to test out the capacities of their super ships (with Raider and Yamamoto pondering why they chose the Navy with men like these), both ships had capable crew and commanders, the shells and weapons are working and neither had any help from tanks or bomber/fighter aircraft: if any, just the biplanes that they had for scouting purposes.

What really interests me is why people consider this a fair fight. Is there an advantage that I don't know about that the Bismarck has that can provide some sort of edge against the Yamato? Or is it just fanboyism, or that not many people ever heard about the Yamato and assume a BB built in an Asian Island Nation would be at beast on par with possibly one of the most well known European BBs built?

I would also like to hear about your opinions on the matter. Do you guys think that Bismarck can win against the Yamato, or do you think that some guys on the internet have drunken way too much then they should've.

There is only one rule to this thread: Oi and Flamme/Marc and Harmon may not comment on the same comment thread, or make responses to other threads via a separate comment thread. Just to make sure that most unnecessary flamewars to avoided ABAP (As Best As Possible)