Talk:Israel/@comment-5889313-20150425175021/@comment-27797576-20150426052824

Marc, I'm sorry, but it's still not an excuse to redact this post. Due to what mace said and the assumntion Zum should be in charge while your gone, AND NOT TELLING HIM TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT, I'm not going to redact this post. Enterprise always left someone in charge when he was gone on something, and yet you never do, and always, ALWAYS, complain about whatever happens to you when a battle happens when your gone.

You suriously don't trust your minors? You could have put me in charge, or Zum, but no, instead, you whine about it for the fact you never did something practically everyone does, and use illogical data. You think we are going to care for you when you don't do what is the norm, and screw up something like this? No. We honestly don't care unless it's something like GM or MG, in which case you disevre what's coming to you.

But suriously, it's an extremely pitiful excuse at this point in RP. Everyone practilly subs people, provided they have any. We can only assume that you left someone in charge. If you didn't, it's your fault, not ours. Plain and simple.

And attackee is not a word. But attacked reffers to the NAVY, not a single individual. If the leader goes inactive and doesn't leave someone capable in charge while the navy is still active, they take full responsibility for not being able to respond, NOT the attackers. So we are not going to redact this.