User blog comment:ThatGenericName/What is allowed and what is not./@comment-11135771-20141112183926/@comment-27822653-20141114062203

Well, I'll go with what doc said:

"Well, let me suggest a revision:

1. Before unleashing the godmod police, we attempt to reason with the godmodding individul, and inform them of their mistake, and list reasons of why we consider that godmodding. 2. If the individual does not understand our logical reasons why his actions are considered godmodding, then he is beyond saving. Unleash the godmod police. Let me put this in example:

Let us say that Mace (sorry) has a gun that can reverse time. Administrators and other users can go and tell Mace that his gun is godmodding, since it simply isn't logical (I can't think of specific reasons why the gun is illegal, other than because it is a stupid idea and that it makes no sense in real life, and would be very impratical and a waste of money). If Mace is an idiot and still thinks his gun is not godmodding, then we unleash the godmod police on him.

Note that the user will feel powerless before the godmod police, and will not have any fun at all, and will whine and cry; this also symbolizes to the user that this is how we feel whenever the user godmods."

-Doc

He posted that with his contributed account, just so you know. Well I think that is a good idea.