Thread:Oicraftian/@comment-12494172-20150630040227/@comment-12494172-20150630041810

I also have a similar post on some of my older ships on the NC wikia. Not a single one of their positive attributes was mentioned. The most positive phrase was something along the lines of "it passed but died later". Do note that of the ships in that review, only Kitten D remains (J-4 was unable to remain in existence after the introduction of J-5). Only. So, if I'm overconfident, then why am I so blatantly aware of having perceived to be inferior vessels? Why am I so into attempting to have more firepower than my opponents? Do I complement my own inner circle only? No, I don't, in my dissection of what my posts meant, it's a little obvious that few to none of those complemented were actually anywhere close to being a friend. Infact, when I say, "even Yukikaze could sink it" doesn't mean I think Yukikaze is uber ship. It means that even the piece of trash Yukikaze can sink you, so that means you'll be at best a speck of dust in comparison to the monster ships of the other people. If you see it my way it's degrading myself, complementing you, and telling the guy that he might want to make his ship A better or B prettier. When I say things poor about a ship, it's relative to what exists on the Wikia. Ie: Yukikaze is for an odd perverse reason a light cruiser. But then, out of the blue: Shoron is an armoured cruiser. Why is this? Because Shoron is built by one who is presumably a better ship builder, therefore it must be a better ship. Makes sense? Probably not...