Thread:Leader1623/@comment-24787182-20151105231613/@comment-27015223-20151106102943

Well the way I see it, your plan hasn't been out into action yet, whereas mine has. Sorry bro, but I'm not stopping.

If you do have the North unite Korea, it would not be the "United Republic of Korea". It would remain the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

Even if the North did break the ceasefire, it has long lost its military, economic, and political superiority to the South since the 80's. It couldn't win. North Korea is a country about has powerful as Ethiopia, except it has a big army and has nukes. South Korea, meanwhile, in the modern day is a G20 power, top 10 military power, and leads the world in many areas of technology.

The North's only "advantage" is its "million-man army" but that is a deceptive "fact" as you are comparing two peace-time militaries instead of the fully mobilized militaries of both sides, in which case the South has parity or superiority to the North in all things but raw numbers of artillery. The only real threats they have are (1. It's few elite armored formations (2. It's spec ops (3. It's submarines (4. It's nuke warheads, but remember that they don't have the rocket tech.

Now think of the implications of the above into the RP universe.

The only realistic path to a united korea is if the South took over the North, which is possible, but hasn't been done because 1. The political problems that arise with doing so 2. The economic costs of rebuilding the north from the tattered state it's already in.

My point is, having the North conquer the South is not a good idea.