Thread:ThatGenericName/@comment-12494172-20150621033557

If I am arrogant, then why do I vicously degrade H-6 from the Naval Craft Wikia and give negative or just "acceptable" reviews on the ION battlefleet (NC)? You know, the ones that are by far worse than my "doesn't look good enough"? For an arrogant person who believes my fleet is best, I certainly don't seem to possess it... (my "super" fleet, the one I will never be satified with, good ship? too bad, too big and looks ugly. Bad ship? does it look good?)



Definition of Arrogant: https://www.google.ca/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8&safe=active&ssui=on#q=arrogance&safe=active&ssui=on

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/arrogance



Now which qualities to I fit?

-I vicously degrade my own fleet almost daily

-I certainly don't try to control you by being ridiculously annoying

-And I only am confident when I have a source. Or the other end agrees. Did I give any ship in my fleet positive reviews? NOPE! EVERY SINGLE ONE contains their issues and ignores ANYTHING they did good. I am not particularly overconfident about my own ships at all, Yukikaze is a good example, Khoi's 46cm cruisers would be murdered in a slug out against them, yet I classify them as Heavy cruisers, and Yukikaze as a light cruiser. What about H-6, what about my early NC battlefleet? they typically sport degrading reports! Only when they do very well do they get the typical review: doesn't look good enough

  