Talk:AIF/@comment-32153776-20160708204749/@comment-27404954-20160722043238

OOC: First of all, these are massive ships plummeting at you at a significant percentage of c. Your AIs can't possibly react fast enough, no matter how "advanced" they are. That's the first part of your post invalidated.

Second of all, your Protoss AIs are incapable of combatting ANF cyberwarfare technology. This is Absurdly Advanced Cyberwarfare -- no navy has AI technology developed to the degree where it can effectively combat said tech, including yours. The second part of your post is also invalid.

Third of all, the UAC ships targeted the Patefactas first as they dove in. Any remaining Patefactas couldn't disrupt any ship unless said ship was right on top of them. Also, Exodus Drive. That's the third part of your post invalidated.

Fourth of all, by the facts of space warfare, any crew attempting to manually control the turrets would take forever to do so, easily allowing them to be vaporized by the task force's superior firepower. Never mind that the virus locked down all weapons and propulsion systems' control functions, whether computer or manual. That's the fourth part of your post gone.

Fifth of all, your ships are uncontrollable due to the aforementioned points about the virus, invalidating that part of your post.

Sixth of all, why do you think I only sent SPARTANs, ODSTs, and tanks, along with Aneph heavy troopers? All of the above have biological and chemical protection in their armor. Silly Zum. That's another part of your post gone.

Seventh of all, you disrupting the AIF warp grid is useless -- the disruptors are primarily mounted on Aneph heavy battleships. That's another bit invalidated.

Eighth of all, your ships would be blasted to pieces by super heavy railguns and MACs before they hit the ground, even assuming that the crews managed to disable their own thrusters. So you'd only get like... what, a twentieth of the casualties? If that?

Ninth of all and finally, you make a good point about your fighters being able to outmaneuver the Longswords, but I contest that I have the superior numerical advantage from UAC and superior fighter-power in the form of the nigh-untouchable Griffon-Cs. I already accounted for said Longsword casualties, nevertheless.

I do believe that's all I need to rebut in your post. I shall duly modify the UAC casualty claims, however, and raise the amount of lost Aneph ground troops. However, please keep in mind that 90% of your post is totally invalid and must be edited. Thank you.