Talk:P.A.N.Z.E.R./@comment-24903406-20151118022041/@comment-24142455-20151120025954

Both sets of designs seem effective enough to be put into service, however, the E92 seems incredibly vulnerable to hostile fire, despite the powerful gun, so indirect fire support might be a better usage (Since a railgun would have incredibly long ranges). The E-150 also seems like a good option, though te profile of the tank seems a bit high, and in reply to compete with your vehicle, Rheinmetall had constructed a tank destroyer currently under the designation of Sturmgeschultz 4A5, as a low profiled tank destroyer and assault gun. This model has 500mm of armor on the casemate, with 400 on the hull, with a 140mm particle beamthough smaller, allows a much more powerful shot, though sacrifices spalling and shrapnel damage for piercing hostile armor. For defense, three MG5s are placed on the tank, one above the gunner's hatch, and two to be used by a dedicated machine gunner.

Although it is lower, and has slightly better casemate armor, it does not have the high powered, and better damaging railgun rounds.

Also for mind of your vehicles, I am also poposing the mounting of a micro nuclear reactor to assist in recharging the railgun at a faster rate, though that is simply up to your choice.



OOC: You think you can design an IG model of the MG5? It's essentially an MG3 (Which is an MG 42 chambered to use the 7.62x51mm NATO round) that uses the 7.92x57mm mauser round.